You are here: Welcome :: Conventions :: Action :: 2005

The game we presented at Action 2005 featured a platoon of Mechanized Infantry from the Black Watch (Royal Highland Regiment), that is 27 Infantry and 4 Warrior IFV´s, against a mixed force of Russians.

The Russians consisted of a section of Airborne, Motor rifles and Conscripts each, plus a squad of Spetznav plus a BMP-3, BTR-80, BRDM-2 and T-80UK. The game is meant to be part of a series of WWIII scenarios and this was it´s playtest. I had tried the forces out against one another last year where the had proven to be well matched.

But back then we had only tested the forces on different terrain and they proved to be uneven this time, so the T-80 will have to go in the

future. The terrain featured a large river with a steel girder bridge

over it in the middle. The Brits had to take the bridge from the

Russians and secure the other side of the river.

 

 

In the first game the Scots lost their LAW 80 AT weapons pretty early

(two of the three troopers carrying them were killed, the third missed

his shot) so they had to try to get their Warriors over the river to

catch the T-80 in the rear or flanks. This was hindered by the wreck of

the BTR that was blocking the bridge and had to be pushed by a Warrior.

That Warrior had almost reached the far ramp (with the other two

remaining ones close on it´s heels) when it was taken out. Now the

bridge was blocked for sure and they had no chance to take out the MBT.

So the game ended there even though it looked OK otherwise with all the

other Russian tanks and ~ 40 % of the Russian infantry gone.

 

 

The second game was mixed bag. The T-80 took a tough non-penetrating

punch early on that killed the Commander and destroyed the sensors. So

in this game it was virtually useless. But the British players decided

to play it save and go slow which cost them 3 Warriors to RPG fire. The

Russians mounted a determined counter attack early on (in which they

lost the BMP with the Motor rifles on board) that managed to get the BTR

and BRDM to the other side of the river. Those heavy machine guns

wrecked havoc on the infantry.

The third game did not go too well for the British either. The players

in this game decided to play it fast and aggressive with all Warriors

going in on one flank and all the infantry except for one section being

mounted. The two Russian wheeled tanks blew up when they again went on a

counter attack destroyed by the Warriors main guns. The T-80 took a high

volume of fire from the Warriors but only suffered minimal structural

damage. Unfortunately the T-80 destroyed 2 Warriors, one more fell to

the BMP and the 4th to an RPG and all during the first turn.

 

As I said the T-80 was the decisive factor in all games and will have to go.

In my previous test with the same forces the terrain did not feature the

bottleneck that the bridge was here. With more manoeuvring space the

forces were equal.

 

The first game where the British players used sound Mechanized Infantry

tactics brought the NATO side the closest to success though and the

scenario should work out that way (although further tests will show).

None the less all players agreed that it was great fun to play and

enjoyed themselves a lot.

© 2004-2011, Alexander Schölling and Burkhard Schulze Print